I guess if Apple didn't comply, in turn, they wouldn't be allowed to sell non-compliant products in Europe.I thought I read somewhere that the European Union are going to force all phone manufacturers (including Apple) to conform to the same standard for chargers (mini USB). This could be a way of making the lightning port useful when it can no longer be used for charging. Can't see Apple having one charging method for Europe and another for the rest of the world.
I guess if Apple didn't comply, in turn, they wouldn't be allowed to sell non-compliant products in Europe.
Sounds about right. Considering Apple invested a lot of time, and most likely quite a bit of $$, into developing the Lightning connector... I could see it being very difficult for them to give up on it that easy.That's the way I read it. I wondered if they might try to justify keeping a different method, reasoning that the port serves more than one purpose.
I'm almost certain making Beats Audio standard on iDevices will be coming in the future. Not sure how well it would work, though, using the lighning connector for external audio. Wouldn't that, in turn, not allow a device to be charging and have headphones connected?
I thought I read somewhere that the European Union are going to force all phone manufacturers (including Apple) to conform to the same standard for chargers (mini USB). This could be a way of making the lightning port useful when it can no longer be used for charging. Can't see Apple having one charging method for Europe and another for the rest of the world.
They exist today. Remember Apple providing chargers to get them out of circulation.I foresee a booming market in cheap low quality chargers that could end up frying the phone or being an electrical hazard.