How do you equate being factual as angry? Because one thing I am not is angry. In fact I avoid anger because it clouds the ability to properly work thru the issue at hand.
Lets see, credibility. I have given no possible reason to doubt my credibility. Your counter argument will be to say I haven't done anything credible. So that leaves us at a stalemate. I do have the advantage of time on my hand, since I intend to be around for awhile. But I doubt you will take the time to read everyone of my posts. Any photographic evidence I present would be pointless due to your constant "You can fake that" argument. Anything I point to that would bolster my discussion you will also claim as fake. Should I ask the software development communities I am involved in to be character witnesses, I can only imagine the heckling that would ensue from you.
This presents an interesting quandary. How do I argue a point that you will claim as fake at every instance?
I am starting to realize something about you from my limited interactions so far. You are quick to call someone a name with no proof of the name being applicable. What does that make you then?
i used to think i would never use even close to 32GB but i thought better too much then not enough because i knew 16 would not be enough but on the nokia i never used close to the 32 on the iphone i have close to 1GB left now i have to delete stuff to save space